This next article is by far the STUPIDEST and most POLITICALLY MOTIVATED I have ever had the distaste to read.
Let's look at it this way, If a man gets breast implants and takes estrogen supplements does it make him now a woman? Sure he could likely dress up and pretend but in every way that MATTERS she is still in possession of THE ROD OF MASCULINITY. So even if he claims to be a she and then goes and gets married while pretending to be a Shela, does that make the marriage legal in the eyes of a state? NO! So the whole thing would be a sham.
Now let us return to the pair of lesbians who have done just this and are now in a sick and twisted fashion are flaunting their fraud. Is there anything laudible about the story? NO! In fact there is something quite to the contrary in this story that was never even mentioned by this OBVIOUSLY "UNBIASED" reporter... FRAUD and CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT FRAUD!!! I am certain there is fraud some where in this story and if I were the AG of Washington I would be looking into pressing charges.
Friday, April 11, 2008
Thursday, February 21, 2008
‘Hero’ girl recovering after SUV shooting
This is a fine example of the Anti-SUV crowd's influence, on the Associated Press' editor who wrote this headline gem of a headline; (that never the less ignores the truthes about SUV's from a safety and pollution perspective, especially when compared to China's "DIRTY" coal-powered eco-catastrophe). "‘Hero’ girl recovering after SUV shooting". I am still trying to figure out how the SUV was involved in the shooting... Other than the fact that a really bad dude hopped into the one these two were riding in before they got shot. It is not really amazing to see this anti-SUV agenda appear only in the Headline... I guess the AP's editor just couldn't let it drive by without peddling his twaddle.
(NOTE: The weak of social and political standing should not read on as I will only infuriate them.)
Now for my Harsh Critique of the overall premise of this article, which left me very annoyed at the mother of this "HEROIN" not "HERO" girl which is a PC attempt to avoid using the correct form of a the word for a female hero.
Words have definitions and the right word ought to be used when it is called for by the context. Just because some drugged out junkie is going to start looking for his "bootlaces"; simply because of the homonymic nature of the drug and the individual of female gender worthy of laud and glory, does not mean you should dumb down your words. This is one of those underlying fundamental cracks in this Great Nation. We are losing our linguistic soul to the cult of PC wordsmithing.
(Note: Bootlaces is slang for a line of heroine.)
Actually, I was very impressed that neither the writer nor the editor tried to play the Gun Control card in this article. But I suppose it would have been awkward to explain how it is that the felon came to be in his possession of a firearm he was banned by law from possessing. (I am quite certain the terms of his parole and conviction made that quite clear.) Yet, it is what I have come to expect from criminals, they break the law. NO MATTER WHAT LAW IT IS!.
Regardless of how "heroic" this story's headline seeks to announce itself. It well enough written as an article in grammar but the obvious questions when unasked. This article strives for an upbeat tone but leaves me knowing that this poor little girl has a the less than stellar mother. She is after all the reason her daughter got shot. Why do I say such a harsh thing? She is the one who had dated a man known to be a violent felon for three months!!!
I am willing to bet he wasn't the first "baddie" she has brought home to her apartment. That is why case ought to have a second investigation. Which would look into the mother's behavior toward her "delayed" daughter, with the intent of the investigation focused on determining her true competency to continue as her "guardian". Remeber it was the mother who so blithely placed her daughter in harms way by bringing a felon into her life. She is anything but this little "Angel's" guardian! There is another word that has a meaning that has been PC'ed out of shape by those with an anti-family agenda.
(NOTE: The weak of social and political standing should not read on as I will only infuriate them.)
Now for my Harsh Critique of the overall premise of this article, which left me very annoyed at the mother of this "HEROIN" not "HERO" girl which is a PC attempt to avoid using the correct form of a the word for a female hero.
Words have definitions and the right word ought to be used when it is called for by the context. Just because some drugged out junkie is going to start looking for his "bootlaces"; simply because of the homonymic nature of the drug and the individual of female gender worthy of laud and glory, does not mean you should dumb down your words. This is one of those underlying fundamental cracks in this Great Nation. We are losing our linguistic soul to the cult of PC wordsmithing.
(Note: Bootlaces is slang for a line of heroine.)
Actually, I was very impressed that neither the writer nor the editor tried to play the Gun Control card in this article. But I suppose it would have been awkward to explain how it is that the felon came to be in his possession of a firearm he was banned by law from possessing. (I am quite certain the terms of his parole and conviction made that quite clear.) Yet, it is what I have come to expect from criminals, they break the law. NO MATTER WHAT LAW IT IS!.
Regardless of how "heroic" this story's headline seeks to announce itself. It well enough written as an article in grammar but the obvious questions when unasked. This article strives for an upbeat tone but leaves me knowing that this poor little girl has a the less than stellar mother. She is after all the reason her daughter got shot. Why do I say such a harsh thing? She is the one who had dated a man known to be a violent felon for three months!!!
I am willing to bet he wasn't the first "baddie" she has brought home to her apartment. That is why case ought to have a second investigation. Which would look into the mother's behavior toward her "delayed" daughter, with the intent of the investigation focused on determining her true competency to continue as her "guardian". Remeber it was the mother who so blithely placed her daughter in harms way by bringing a felon into her life. She is anything but this little "Angel's" guardian! There is another word that has a meaning that has been PC'ed out of shape by those with an anti-family agenda.
Why this??? Why now???
Poorly constructed articles are a pet peeve of mine, yet the ones that take the cake are those that are blatantly blinded by an agenda. These types of articles are surprisingly all to often released by large media outlets that seek to pretend to have no bias, which is a hallmark of truly excellent journalism. If a journalist wishes to cover a subject they need to clearly and concisely represent both sides of a story and then if they wish to add in their closing their take on the subject it is an acceptable and even laudable practice. Sadly most issue pieces favor one side or the other exclusively and feature only weak points on the other side as possible alternatives. This is a very poor practice in reporting and shows obvious lack of competence and intellect on the part of the journalist. If a journalist claims to have no bias they should truly represent no bias. However if the journalist has a particular opinion of point of view in writing the article they should fully disclose this up front. In so doing the journalist lends perspective, clarity and credibility to their article. Any other practice is dishonest and should be rejected out of hand by any truly objective Editor in the world.
So with those principles in mind let me state my point of view for you at the out set of this blog. I believe in the Constitution of the United States unadulterated and unaltered those who wish to remove meaning from it that is clearly stated or to remove meaning from it to satisfy their particular political views. I believe in the sanctity of God's laws and accept them as the basic building block of society. I reject radical fundamentalism in any and all forms, be they conservative or liberal, Christian, Jewish, Islamic, Buddhist or other creed. I believe in and sustain my Nation, even when I find fault in a particular practice, party or people. The practice of which mandates that I grant all I meat this same freedom provided they too uphold the sanctity of the foundation of this Nation.
So with those principles in mind let me state my point of view for you at the out set of this blog. I believe in the Constitution of the United States unadulterated and unaltered those who wish to remove meaning from it that is clearly stated or to remove meaning from it to satisfy their particular political views. I believe in the sanctity of God's laws and accept them as the basic building block of society. I reject radical fundamentalism in any and all forms, be they conservative or liberal, Christian, Jewish, Islamic, Buddhist or other creed. I believe in and sustain my Nation, even when I find fault in a particular practice, party or people. The practice of which mandates that I grant all I meat this same freedom provided they too uphold the sanctity of the foundation of this Nation.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)